The Court held in
People v. Perez, that hymenal
lacerations, whether healed or fresh, are the best evidence of forcible
defloration. And when the consistent and forthright testimony of a rape victim
is consistent with medical findings, there is sufficient basis to warrant a
conclusion that the essential requisites of carnal knowledge have been
established.
LEX Pilipinas
Miyerkules, Setyembre 24, 2014
Did a person commit rape if he had sexual congress with a girl under 12 years old?
Sexual congress
with a girl under 12 years old is always rape. (People v. Perez, G.R. No. 182924,
December 24, 2008, 575 SCRA 653, 681.)
In this type of
rape, force and intimidation are immaterial; the only subject of inquiry is the
age of the woman and whether carnal knowledge took place. The law presumes that the victim does
not and cannot have a will of her own on account of her tender years; the
child’s consent is immaterial because of her presumed incapacity to discern
evil from good.
Mga etiketa:
criminal law,
girl 12 yrs under,
rape,
remedial law
What are the requisites for a charge of rape to prosper?
For a charge of
rape to prosper under Article 266-A of the Revised Penal Code, as amended, the
prosecution must prove that (1) the offender had carnal knowledge of a woman;
and (2) he accomplished such act through force, threat, or intimidation, or
when she was deprived of reason or otherwise unconscious, or when she was under
12 years of age or was demented. (People v. Trayco, G.R. No. 171313, August 14,
2009, 596 SCRA 233, 244)
Mga etiketa:
criminal law,
rape,
remedial law,
requisites of rape,
revised penal code
What is the effect in a charge of murder if there was no evidence of treachery?
Without evident
premeditation, and without any evidence to appreciate the aggravating
circumstance of treachery in the killing, the accused can only be held liable
as principal for the crime of homicide as defined and penalized under Article
249 of the Revised Penal Code.
Mga etiketa:
absence of treachery,
crime,
criminal law,
effect,
remedial law
Is it a requirement for witnesses to know the names of the assailants?
Witnesses need not know the names
of the assailants, as long as they recognize the latter’s faces. What is
imperative is that, on the basis of their personal knowledge, the witnesses are
positive as to the physical identification of the perpetrators. (People v. Sorila, Jr., 578 Phil. 931 [2008]).
Thus, it was sufficient that the
witnesses were able to identify the accused in the crime scene and when they
took the witness stand.
Mga etiketa:
crime,
criminal law,
criminal procedure,
law,
remedial law,
witness
When is there treachery?
There is
treachery when the offender commits any of the crimes against persons by
employing means, methods or forms that tend directly and especially to ensure
its execution without risk to the offender arising from the defense that the
offended party might make.
What are the requisites that the prosecution must prove in a murder charge?
For the
charge of murder to prosper, the prosecution must prove the following: (1) the
offender killed the victim, and (2) the killing was done through treachery, or
by any of the five other qualifying circumstances, duly alleged in the
Information. (People v.
Gabrino,G.R. No. 189981, 9 March 2011, 645 SCRA 187.)
Mga etiketa:
crime,
criminal law,
criminal procedure,
murder
Mag-subscribe sa:
Mga Post (Atom)